Page 21 - JSW_Bolt_Cover
P. 21

INNOVATION                                                                         JSW ENERGY BOLT  |  ISSUE 1W ENERGY BOLT  |  ISSUE 1
                                                                                    JS
 What were the challenges encountered?  overwhelmed by the results in the form of   How was the problem solved?  How the team felt on the problem being

 savings and learning.                                          resolved?
 First challenge to proceed with the above   In-House Generator Stator Chemical

 modification was minimum support   Any specific aspects which you may like   Cleaning by introducing Nitrogen (N2)   The entire team had felt extremely happy
 available from OEMs. All the activities   to mention?  bubbling arrangement in SCW tank to   as the problem was solved in-house

 planned and executed by in-house team   reduce Dissolved Oxygen in stator water.   without disturbed the stator coil system.
  ESP and Ash handling plants are common
 comprising of personnel from different   This Chemical cleaning was process was   Management had given positive response
 in most of the JSW establishments, as the
 departments.   including selection of cleaning chemical,       & supported in all aspects to achieve the
 loop holes were identified, solutions were
        circulation pump, corrosion inhibitors,                 results.
 Impact of solution to the business?  ideated with the help of domain expertise.
        online monitoring of chemical & process
 Implemented various methodologies to                           Any specific aspects which you may like
 a.  Savings in Hopper heater Power   parameters, balancing of N2 pressure &
 overcome the problems and hence can                            to mention?
 consumption is 61 KWH resulted in   DO in stator water system. In this process
 be institutionalized.
 INR18.27 Lacs/Annum.  injection of chemical solution was       Management supported well and they

        continuously done for nearly 72 hrs. at                 believed in our team to carry out such a
 b.  Savings in AHP Power consumption is
 Team Members  inlet of stator coil, in parallel with removal   critical activity without. After seeing the
 28 KWH resulted in INR 8.38 Lacs/ Annum.

 Abhishek Nayak   of contaminants (copper oxides) at outlet     results, the same activity was repeated in
 c.  Savings in ESP field power   by using Mixed Bed (MB) in SCW system.   Jaigarh plant also.
 Rajendran S
 consumption is 250 KWH/Unit resulted in   High pure Nitrogen (N2) was used for
 Meenakshi Sharma
 INR  70.73 Lacs / Annum/Unit.  blanketing to reduce the DO in stator     Team Members
 Madhukar D

 Total Savings INR 389.32 Lacs / Annum for   Bheemesh D  water system.  The overall activity was   Shashi Bhushana  B
        carried out in coordination with
 4X300 MW Units was achieved.                                      Srinivas  Amjuri
        Chemistry, Operation and Maintenance                       Chetan  Kumar SV
 Savings achieved with zero investment in   Innovative Idea :   dept.  Total Cost incurred for the said

 AHP and ESP fields and with a small   Generator Stator   activity was Rs. 5000/-.
 expenditure of INR 3 lakhs for hopper   Chemical

 heaters sensors  Cleaning-300 Mw  Impact of solution to the
        business?
 How the team felt on the problem being   How and Why was the problem

 resolved?   This had saved cost of generator
 identified?
        stator coils and cost of cleaning
 Since the project taken up was a process   Increasing trend in 300 MW Generator   by OEM is around Rupees 120
 improvement and energy saving task,   stator coil differential pressure indicating   Lacs/Unit. And Generator

 team comprising of   the flow restrictions within the stator   performance was improvement a
 Mr. Abhishek Nayak,   cooling water channels. Observed there   lot. Generator stator DP reduced

 Mr. Rajendran,   was continuous increasing trend in Stator   from 0.23 to 0.15 Mpa, stator
 Ms. Meenakshi Sharma,   coil dP from 0.15 to 0.23 Mpa and   water flow improved from 46 to 55

 Mr. Madhukar and   reduction in stator water flow from   TPH.
 Mr. Govindaraju a totally cross functional   55 to 46 TPH.

 team from different disciplines was


 16                                                                                                                17
   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26